This budget airline has a poor reputation and it’s justified

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This budget airline has a poor reputation and it’s justified

By David Whitley

The airline: Wizz Air

  • Route London Gatwick to Rome Fiumicino, flight number W4 6006
  • Frequency 17 times a week
  • Aircraft Airbus A321 neo
  • Class Economy: Seat 7C
  • Flight time 2 hours, 36 minutes (arriving six minutes late after a delayed departure)
WizzAir – more like fizz air.

WizzAir – more like fizz air.

Checking in

Checking in online and waltzing through the airport with your boarding pass is easy. But part of the reason Wizz Air consistently finishes last in consumer magazine Travel’s customer surveys is the hateful, gruelling booking process – a continual attempt to add on extra fees.

There’s no way of removing the £8 ($16.50) “administration fee” for booking online, and I still can’t come up with an explanation of how this is legal.

Baggage

Wizz Air was a gleeful pioneer in making it practically impossible to travel with only hand luggage without extra payment. Your free bag can measure a maximum of 40 centimetres by 30 centimetres by 20 centimetres and has to fit under the seat in front. Taking something bigger than a mouse’s purse is where the gouging comes in. For a normal cabin bag (55 centimetres by 40 centimetres by 23 centimetres), I’m charged £46.96 ($96.65) extra. To check in a 20-kilogram case would have cost £50.76.

Loyalty scheme

The Wizz Air Discount Club offers money off items bought on board, fares and baggage check-in fees. At the highest price point of €349.99 ($603.44) a year, free seat selection and larger carry-on bags are thrown in. None of this is worth it for an Australian booking one or two flights on a European jaunt.

Advertisement

The seat

Not the most comfortable seats.

Not the most comfortable seats.Credit: David Whitley

I was expecting a monstrosity of a plane held together with masking tape. However, it looks smart and new, with blue plastic seats in a three-three formation. Those thin, hard seats don’t recline and they’re not very big – with a horrible 28 inch (71 centimetres) pitch and only mildly less horrible 17.7 inch (45 centimetres) width. For context, Qantas narrow-body planes give you 30 inches (76 centimetres) pitch. Fortunately, the seat next to me is empty, so I don’t feel the full brunt of the airline trying to squeeze 40 rows into a narrow-body plane.

Entertainment + tech

Wizz Magazine, one of the last holdouts in the dying world of the in-flight mag, features stories of a light-sabre academy in Iceland, Ferrari’s legacy in Bologna and the secret underground in Brussels. It’s a decent effort, elevated by the fact there’s no charging point or Wi-Fi.

Service

Little bang for your buck.

Little bang for your buck.Credit: David Whitley

The crew are pleasant and efficient – perhaps over-efficient when the safety announcement is rattled off as quickly as possible. However, seatbelt signs are kept on bafflingly long through zero turbulence, and the cabin is heated to the point where I suspect the passengers are being cooked as an extra food option.

Food

The magazine promises a variety of rather dismal-looking meals, including a beef noodle soup, an optimistically labelled “tapas plate” and a bowl of cheese polenta from a Dr Oetker packet. The reality is two dry-looking cheese croissants available for the entire plane. I nobly leave the croissants to someone else, feasting instead on a Snickers and a 187-millilitre bottle of red wine labelled “Made in the European Union”. This costs an annoyingly high €9.50 ($16.40), and the final indignity comes in a screw cap that won’t unscrew. I have to hack it apart with a pen to access my precious wine of unidentified nationality.

Sustainability

Loading

Wizz Air aims to cut its CO² emissions by 25 per cent before 2030 and offers an offsetting scheme and travel footprint calculator. It also boasts that its young fleet and policy of trying to fill every plane has led to one of the lowest emissions rates per passenger, per kilometre of any airline in Europe*.

One more thing

Much of Wizz Air’s success comes from offering flights to airports off the usual tourist circuit. Suceava (Romania), Kosice (Slovakia), Samarkand (Uzbekistan), Lublin (Poland) and Ohrid (Macedonia) are among dozens of destinations routinely ignored by other airlines.

The price

My £13.99 ($29) fare plus £8 ($16.50) administration fee flight in January ended up costing £68.95 ($141.90), once a reasonable-sized carry-on bag and the nebulous administration fee were added.**

The verdict

While not quite as bad as expected, Wizz Air is still towards the bottom end of Europe’s budget carriers. Tiny seats, meagre food and fee-gouging justify its poor reputation.

Our rating out of five

★★

The writer flew at his own expense. See wizzair.com

*For more information about air travel and sustainability, see iata.org

**Fares are based on those available for travel three months from the time of publication and subject to change.

Sign up for the Traveller newsletter

The latest travel news, tips and inspiration delivered to your inbox. Sign up now.

Most viewed on Traveller

Loading