Amy Coney Barrett Could Give Supreme Court Win To Planned Parenthood

Video
Related Videos
AD Loading ...
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 1:07
Loaded: 17.59%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 1:07
Â
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • default, selected
    Amy Coney Barrett's Surprising Remarks in Abortion Pill Case

    🎙️ Voice is AI-generated. Inconsistencies may occur.

    Amy Coney Barrett, Conservative Supreme Court justice, appears to want Planned Parenthood to remain an option on Medicaid.

    What It Matters

    South Carolina is seeking to exclude Planned Parenthood from the health care assistance program, Medicaid, because it is an abortion provider, even though abortion is only available on Medicaid in very limited circumstances, such a threat to the life of the mother.

    South Carolina's Planned Parenthood Medicaid ban is total and includes everything from contraception to health checkups. Should South Carolina succeed in the Supreme Court, other conservative states will likely block Planned Parenthood from Medicaid.

    Newsweek sought email comment from Planned Parenthood and the office of South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster on Friday.

    barrett kagan
    File photo: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan stand at the National Cathedral on January 9, 2025 in Washington, D.C. Ricky Carioti/Getty Images

    What To Know

    During Supreme Court oral arguments on April 2, Barrett repeatedly appeared to take the side of liberal Supreme Court justices in questioning attorney John Bursch, who was presenting South Carolina.

    Barrett, a Trump nominee to the Supreme Court, strongly backed the position taken by liberal judge, Elena Kagan, and imagined a scenario where a South Carolina Medicaid beneficiary wanted to see a Dr. Jones but was being unfairly blocked by the state.

    Barrett said: "Mr. Bursch, I mean, don't you think -- you know, if I want to go see Dr. Jones, and Dr. Jones, that's the provider of my choice, and the state has disqualified Dr. Jones, and, as Justice Kagan points out, you know, the statute says 'may obtain the benefits,' there's no mechanism, am I right, for the beneficiary to say, well, you're depriving me of my ability -- we won't call it right; we won't use the loaded word -- but my ability to see the provider of my choice, and nobody is disputing that Dr. Jones can provide the services in a competent way that I want to have?"

    According to the Supreme Court transcript, Barrett later backed liberal judge, Sonia Sotomayor, in pointing out that low-income Medicaid recipients had to take the risk that they would not be reimbursed for some services.

    "The beneficiary remedy, as Justice Sotomayor pointed out, that's if your claim is denied, right? So then that's the beneficiary taking the risk, going to the provider she wants to see, and then potentially having to pay out of pocket, right?"

    What People Are Saying

    Planned Parenthood said in a statement: "The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has affirmed three times that people who use Medicaid as their insurance have the right to visit any qualified family planning provider that accepts Medicaid, including those that provide abortion, like Planned Parenthood South Atlantic and that patients can sue to enforce that right."

    Conservative group, Alliance Defending Freedom, which provided legal services to South Carolina for the case, said in a statement that the case was about fighting abortion providers.

    "ADF is defending the ability of pro-life states like South Carolina to direct Medicaid funds away from abortion giants like Planned Parenthood. Medicaid funds should be used to protect life, not destroy it. No citizen should be forced to fund facilities that perform life-ending and medically fraught procedures like abortion," it said.

    What Happens Next

    It is not yet known when the Supreme Court will reach a decision, but it will aim to conclude the case by the end of June.

    The Supreme Court website states: "Oral arguments typically conclude in April and for the remainder of the term the Court releases orders and opinions."

    Newsweek Logo

    fairness meter

    fairness meter

    Newsweek is committed to journalism that's factual and fair.

    Hold us accountable and submit your rating of this article on the meter.

    Newsweek is committed to journalism that's factual and fair.

    Hold us accountable and submit your rating of this article on the meter.

    Created with Highcharts 11.4.8
    UnfairLeftleaning
    Mostly Fair
    Left leaning
    Fair
    Mostly Fair
    Right leaning
    UnfairRightleaning
    Click On Meter To Rate This Article

    About the writer

    Sean O'Driscoll is a Newsweek Senior Crime and Courts Reporter based in Ireland. His focus is reporting on U.S. law. He has covered human rights and extremism extensively. Sean joined Newsweek in 2023 and previously worked for The Guardian, The New York Times, BBC, Vice and others from the Middle East. He specialized in human rights issues in the Arabian Gulf and conducted a three-month investigation into labor rights abuses for The New York Times. He was previously based in New York for 10 years. He is a graduate of Dublin City University and is a qualified New York attorney and Irish solicitor. You can get in touch with Sean by emailing s.odriscoll@newsweek.com. Languages: English and French.


    Sean O'Driscoll is a Newsweek Senior Crime and Courts Reporter based in Ireland. His focus is reporting on U.S. law. ... Read more