- Chapters
- descriptions off, selected
- captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
- captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Judge rules Trump administration to reinstate legal aid for migrant children
By Craig Nigrelli (Anchor/Reporter), Jodie Hawkins (Senior Producer), Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor)
- A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reinstate legal funding for migrant children. The order temporarily blocks a funding cut that could have left many children without legal representation in immigration proceedings.
- Nonprofit groups argued that the funding cut would leave children vulnerable to deportation, citing a 2008 anti-human trafficking law that requires the government to provide legal representation to minors “to the greatest extent practicable.”
- The court’s order will expire on April 16, with a final decision to follow, while the Department of Health and Human Services has yet to comment on the ruling.
Full Story
A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reinstate legal funding for migrant children who come to the United States alone. The ruling, issued Wednesday, April 2, temporarily blocks the administration’s order from last month.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- A federal judge in California ordered the Trump administration to temporarily restore legal aid for tens of thousands of unaccompanied migrant children in the U.S. without parents or guardians.
- The order comes after a lawsuit from eleven subcontractor groups who stated that 26,000 children were at risk of losing their attorneys, citing a violation of a 2008 law.
- U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín emphasized that legal representation promotes efficiency and fairness within the immigration system during the proceedings.
- Defendants from the Department of Health and Human Services argued there is no taxpayer obligation for legal aid; plaintiffs countered they seek a return to prior funding for legal counsel.
- A federal judge in California ordered the Trump administration to temporarily restore legal aid to unaccompanied migrant children.
- The judge said advocates raised legitimate questions about whether the administration violated a 2008 anti-trafficking law requiring legal counsel for vulnerable children.
- The ruling is the third legal setback in less than a week for the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.
- A federal judge in California has issued a temporary restraining order to stop the Trump administration from ending funding for legal counsel for unaccompanied migrant minors, effective April 1, until at least April 16.
- U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín expressed concerns about the administration potentially violating the 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act.
- Eleven subcontractor groups argued that 26,000 unaccompanied children risk losing their attorneys due to the funding cut, which they claim violates their rights.
- Defendants, including the Department of Health and Human Services, claim that taxpayers are not required to fund direct legal aid to migrant children in light of government budget constraints.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
What is the response to the judge’s order?
Nonprofit groups said the funding cut could cause thousands of children to lose access to their attorneys. The groups said this gives children a disadvantage in immigration proceedings, making them more likely to be deported.
The government argued that the funding was discretionary and not required to give the children legal representation.
But the judge said ending the funding meant the government potentially violated its duty to protect children from human trafficking.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The nonprofits cited a 2008 anti-human trafficking law, which states the government must, to the “greatest extent practicable,” provide legal representation to minors.
According to the groups’ complaint, children represented by the nonprofits arrived in the U.S. to escape violence and poverty and most don’t speak English and can’t afford hiring a lawyer.
How many migrant children attend court hearings?
Children who have lawyers attend hearings 95% of the time, while those without representation attend only 33% of the time, according to the American Immigration Council.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
What happens next?
The Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the care of migrant children, has yet to comment on the temporary ruling.
The order will expire on April 16, followed by a final decision by the court.
[Craig Nigrelli}
A FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERED THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO REINSTATE LEGAL FUNDING FOR MIGRANT CHILDREN WHO COME TO THE U-S ALONE.
THE RULING WEDNESDAY, TEMPORARILY BLOCKS THE ADMINISTRATION’S ORDER FROM LAST MONTH.
NON-PROFIT GROUPS SAID THE FUNDING CUT COULD CAUSE THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN TO LOSE ACCESS TO THEIR ATTORNEYS, GIVING THEM A DISADVANTAGE IN IMMIGRATION PROCEEDINGS AND MORE LIKELY TO GET DEPORTED.
THE GOVERNMENT ARGUED THE FUNDING WAS DISCRETIONARY AND IT WAS NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE CHILDREN WITH LEGAL REPRESENTATION.
BUT THE JUDGE SAID ENDING THE FUNDING MEANT THE GOVERNMENT POTENTIALLY VIOLATED ITS DUTY TO PROTECT CHILDREN FROM HUMAN TRAFFICKING.
THE NON-PROFITS CITED A 2008 ANTI-HUMAN TRAFFICKING LAW, WHICH STATES THE GOVERNMENT MUST, TO THE “GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICABLE,” PROVIDE LEGAL REPRESENTATION TO MINORS.
ACCORDING TO THE GROUPS’ COMPLAINT, CHILDREN REPRESENTED BY THE NONPROFITS ARRIVED IN THE U-S TO ESCAPE VIOLENCE AND POVERTY – AND MOST DON’T SPEAK ENGLISH AND CAN’T AFFORD HIRING A LAWYER.
CHILDREN WHO HAVE LAWYERS ATTEND HEARINGS 95 PERCENT OF THE TIME, WHILE THOSE WITHOUT REPRESENTATION ATTEND ONLY 33 PERCENT OF THE TIME, ACCORDING TO THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL.
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, WHICH OVERSEES THE CARE OF MIGRANT CHILDREN, HAS YET TO COMMENT ON THE TEMPORARY RULING.
THE ORDER WILL EXPIRE ON APRIL 16TH FOLLOWED BY A FINAL DECISION BY THE COURT.
FOR SAN, I’M CRAIG NIGRELLI.
FOR ALL YOUR LATEST NEWS HEADLINES – DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- A federal judge in California ordered the Trump administration to temporarily restore legal aid for tens of thousands of unaccompanied migrant children in the U.S. without parents or guardians.
- The order comes after a lawsuit from eleven subcontractor groups who stated that 26,000 children were at risk of losing their attorneys, citing a violation of a 2008 law.
- U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín emphasized that legal representation promotes efficiency and fairness within the immigration system during the proceedings.
- Defendants from the Department of Health and Human Services argued there is no taxpayer obligation for legal aid; plaintiffs countered they seek a return to prior funding for legal counsel.
- A federal judge in California ordered the Trump administration to temporarily restore legal aid to unaccompanied migrant children.
- The judge said advocates raised legitimate questions about whether the administration violated a 2008 anti-trafficking law requiring legal counsel for vulnerable children.
- The ruling is the third legal setback in less than a week for the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.
- A federal judge in California has issued a temporary restraining order to stop the Trump administration from ending funding for legal counsel for unaccompanied migrant minors, effective April 1, until at least April 16.
- U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín expressed concerns about the administration potentially violating the 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act.
- Eleven subcontractor groups argued that 26,000 unaccompanied children risk losing their attorneys due to the funding cut, which they claim violates their rights.
- Defendants, including the Department of Health and Human Services, claim that taxpayers are not required to fund direct legal aid to migrant children in light of government budget constraints.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Ben Montgomery/Getty Images
Trump triples tariffs to plug ‘de minimis’ loophole, could impact Temu and Shein
Watch 1:5512 hrs ago -
Sandia National Laboratories
America’s newest nuclear bomb built seven months early
Watch 2:0118 hrs ago -
Getty Stock
More Americans tapping into 401(k) retirement for emergency funds
Watch 2:0819 hrs ago -
FRANCESCO SPOTORNO/AFP via Getty Images
Singer, 2 ex-MLB players among 113 killed in nightclub collapse
Watch 0:4421 hrs ago